Skip to main content

Solar for university and college campuses in Bangladesh: several roofs, several meters

How campus metering, the long summer break and UGC development funding change a rooftop solar project, and what to fix in the specification before the tender goes out.

The first question on a campus solar project is not how much roof there is. It is how many electricity meters the campus has, and whose name each one is in. A university that looks like a single customer to its own vice chancellor can look like nine customers to the distribution utility, and net metering in Bangladesh is settled per connection. Get that wrong at survey stage and the plant that was approved on paper cannot be built the way it was drawn.

Count the connections before you count the roof area

Campuses grow building by building, and the electrical supply grows with them. It is normal to find an older academic block on one low tension connection, a newer block on its own, halls of residence on a third, a workshop or auditorium on a fourth, and a pump house connection nobody in the estate office remembers sanctioning. Some campuses instead take a single high tension supply at 11 kV into their own substation and distribute internally. That is the easier case by a distance.

It matters because the net metering guidelines cap the plant at a share of the consumer's sanctioned load, and that ceiling attaches to the connection, not to the institution. Six small connections do not add up to one large allowance. Each also needs its own application, its own agreement and its own bi-directional meter, which multiplies the paperwork and multiplies the number of desks at which the file can stop moving.

There is no group or virtual netting provision to fall back on. If the buildings are metered separately, the design has to live with it.

The academic year moves the load, and the long break moves it most

An office building draws roughly the same load every working day of the year. A campus does not. Teaching weeks, examination weeks, the long summer break, Ramadan and Eid closures and the gap between sessions all produce different curves, and the distance between a full teaching week and a vacation week is wide enough to change the sizing decision.

Three things usually keep running through a break, and they are what stops export from becoming the whole story: halls of residence, where a proportion of students stay on, research laboratories with incubators, freezers and animal houses that cannot be switched off, and the campus network room. Everything else, lecture theatre air conditioning above all, goes quiet.

Size against the vacation baseline first and the teaching load second. A plant sized to a full teaching week spends the longest holiday of the year exporting, and exported units are settled on the terms written into the net metering agreement rather than at the retail rate you avoid paying when you consume your own generation. That is not an argument for building small. It is an argument for knowing which months are paying for the plant, so that nobody is surprised by the September bill.

Choosing which roofs to use

The instinct is to start with the tallest building. The better starting point is the building whose meter carries the largest daytime load, because a unit consumed behind that meter is worth more than a unit exported from it.

Campuses are spread out, and the temptation to run one long cable from a distant roof back to a central inverter room is expensive in copper and in losses. Keep inverters close to their arrays, aggregate on the alternating current side, and check the voltage drop calculation on the longest run before the cable schedule is priced.

What UGC funding does to the process

A public university buying solar with development funds is not buying the way a private company buys. The project has to appear in a development project proposal, be approved, sit in the annual development programme and then be tendered under the Public Procurement Rules through e-GP. That sequence has technical consequences, and they are worth understanding before the specification is written rather than after the bids are opened.

Private universities have a shorter route, usually a board approval and a negotiated award, but they meet the same trap in another form: a quotation that looks cheap because the structure, the earthing or the maintenance has been left out of it. Ask any bidder to price the same scope, in the same order, on one page.

Specify for the teaching value or you will not get it

Almost every campus proposal says the plant will double as a teaching resource. Few of them end up being one, because the monitoring turns out to be a vendor portal with a single login, the data cannot be exported, and the electrical engineering department has no route onto the roof.

What goes wrong on campuses

A sequence that works

  1. Collect twelve months of bills for every connection, with the sanctioned load and tariff category written on each one.
  2. Log the largest connections for a week in teaching term and again during a vacation, so the two load curves are measured rather than assumed.
  3. Survey the roofs for structure, shading, access and cable route, and get the original structural drawings out of the estate office while you are there.
  4. Fix the connection strategy: which array feeds which meter, and whether any connections can be merged first.
  5. Write the specification, including monitoring, structure, maintenance period and documentation, then tender it.
  6. Apply for net metering connection by connection, with the single line diagram, datasheets and test certificates the utility asks for, and track each file separately.
  7. Commission with the university's own engineer present, and record string level readings on the day, because that set of numbers is the baseline every future year is judged against.

Back to all Insights