Skip to main content

Choosing a first instrument for a new materials research group in Bangladesh

One line item, a group that wants everything, and a decision that shapes the next five years. Buy the measurement you need every week and cannot borrow, not the one that looks best in the proposal.

A new group gets its first equipment grant with one substantial line item on it. Six people want six different instruments, the proposal named an electron microscope because that is what proposals name, and the decision made in the next month will shape what the group can publish for five years.

Start from the measurement you cannot borrow

Write two lists. The first is every measurement the group's next three papers need. The second is which of those can be obtained somewhere else: a shared facility at another university, BCSIR, a national laboratory, or a collaborator abroad who will run a batch of samples.

Anything on the first list and not the second is a candidate. Anything you can send out once a month, send out. Turnaround at a shared facility is slow and irritating, and still far cheaper than owning an instrument that runs six days a year.

Then apply the frequency test. The right first instrument is the one your students need weekly, which is normally not the most impressive one on the list. A measurement you take twenty times a week, in your own building, at ten at night, is what changes how fast a group works.

Three honest candidates

What the first instrument has to survive

Back to all Insights